Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon from the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined from the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may well seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons owning their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to try and do absent with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on recognized judicial authority to formulate their positions.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Specified the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are on the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're subject matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion could be considered, however, we are clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, matter to availability of vacancy matter for the approval from the competent authority. Read more
Electronic and paper court records retained in the court site may be viewed for the courthouse for free, however there is often a payment of ten cents for each page to print from a public access terminal.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is founded along with the employee is found guilty after due process of legislation, it's the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, outside of the assorted penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed isn't proportionate with the seriousness on the act of misconduct isn't enough although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful manner. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, Maybe overruling the previous case legislation by setting a completely new precedent of higher authority. This may possibly transpire several times as the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later in the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement from the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Unless of course case is experimented with(Bail Matters)
A decreased court may well not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it is unjust; it case law australia might only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it could both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts with the cases; some jurisdictions allow for any judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded on the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )